WebAbstract. A disinterested Texas bank brought a federal interpleader action under 28 U.S.C. (1952) §1335 against a Texas widow and four joint claimants, three of whom were Texas citizens and the other a Tennessee citizen. On appeal from a summary judgment for the joint claimants, the widow argued that the court lacked jurisdiction. Held, affirmed. Webconcept of "minimal diversity" in defining the constitutional scope of the Diversity Clause of Article II.0 The Article concludes that Tashire does not support the expansive …
Can impleader destroy diversity? Explained by FAQ Blog
WebStatutory Interpleader. 28 U.S.C. § 1335 allows an individual with a stake which is, or may be, ... is irrelevant to the rule. This is known as minimal diversity and was held to be permissible under Article III, § 2 of the United States Constitution, State Farm Fire and Cas. Co. v. Tashire 386 U.S. 523, 530 (1967) Webminimal diversity noun min· i· mal diversity ˈmi-nə-məl- : diversity of citizenship of the parties to a lawsuit in which at least one plaintiff is a resident from a state different from … hints neurology
Interpleader - Wikipedia
Webi. G could use defensive interpleader- minimal diversity- I own it, but if I don’t it goes to E or F. ii. 19 would be used if interpleader weren’t available- if F weren’t a minor, and thus … Web25 mei 2024 · Learn the interpleader definition, ... Minimal diversity is involved, meaning the two claimants are citizens of different states, and the stakeholders' citizenship is not … Web10 apr. 2024 · Congress has also granted district courts original jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1335 over "any civil interpleader action contesting a fund of $500 or more if two or more adverse claimants are of diverse citizenship." Watson v.Cartee, 817 F.3d 299, 303-04 (6th Cir. 2016) (citing 28 U.S.C. § 1335(a)-(a)(1)).Unum alleges in the alternative that the … hints nursery